Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-lós
Appearance
Proto-Indo-European
[edit]Suffix
[edit]- Forms agent nouns from verbal roots.
- Forms diminutive nouns from noun stems.
- Forms adjectives with the sense “pertaining to …” (alternative form of *-rós).
Inflection
[edit]Thematic | |||
---|---|---|---|
singular | |||
nominative | *(Ø)-lós | ||
genitive | *(Ø)-lósyo | ||
singular | dual | plural | |
nominative | *(Ø)-lós | *(Ø)-lóh₁ | *(Ø)-lóes |
vocative | *(Ø)-lé | *(Ø)-lóh₁ | *(Ø)-lóes |
accusative | *(Ø)-lóm | *(Ø)-lóh₁ | *(Ø)-lóms |
genitive | *(Ø)-lósyo | *? | *(Ø)-lóHom |
ablative | *(Ø)-léad | *? | *(Ø)-lómos, *(Ø)-lóbʰos |
dative | *(Ø)-lóey | *? | *(Ø)-lómos, *(Ø)-lóbʰos |
locative | *(Ø)-léy, *(Ø)-lóy | *? | *(Ø)-lóysu |
instrumental | *(Ø)-lóh₁ | *? | *(Ø)-lṓys |
Related terms
[edit]Derived terms
[edit]- *-e-lós (also *-o-lós?)
- *-eh₁-lós
- *-eh₂-lós
- ⇒? *-i-los (or perhaps originally thematicized from an old suffix *-yl̥)
- ⇒? *-u-los[note 3]
Descendants
[edit]- Proto-Balto-Slavic: *-lás, *-las
- Proto-Slavic: *-lъ (see there for further descendants)
- Proto-Celtic: *-los
- Proto-Germanic: *-laz
- Proto-Hellenic: *-lós, *-los
- Proto-Indo-Iranian: *-lás, *-las, *-rás, *-ras
- Proto-Italic: *-los
- Latin: -lus
- Proto-Tocharian: *-le
- Notes
The variety of derived forms is usually explained as absorption of the stems from different noun types (o-, eh₂-, i- and u-stems) into the suffix, or as influence from verbal suffixes. Germanic *-a- ~ *-i- ~ *-u- alternation may simply result from a type of umlaut or varying reflexes of a schwa.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 From the o-grade (possibly merged with *-ol-o-s), but may also reflect *-ulos. Latin -ulus can also be directly from *-elos. Slavic *-ъlъ can also be explained as from regressive hardening.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Can reflect either *-elós or *-ilos.
- ^ Contaminated by or merged with a separate suffix *-ul-o-s, thematicized from *-wl̥ in late PIE.
References
[edit]- ^ Schrijver, Peter C. H. (1991) The reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals in Latin (Leiden studies in Indo-European; 2), Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi, →ISBN, page 456
- ^ Sihler, Andrew L. (1995) New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 367
- ^ Brugmann, Karl with translators Conway, R. Seymour and Rouse, W. H. D. (1891) A Comparative Grammar of the Indo-Germanic Languages, 1st edition, volume II, part I, New York: B. Westermann & Co., § 76, page 198