Jump to content

Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2017-10/User:Chuck Entz for checkuser

Add links
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary

User:Chuck Entz for checkuser

[edit]

Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Chuck Entz as a local English Wiktionary CheckUser. Chuck has indicated willingness in the BP discussion.

Schedule:

Acceptance: I accept this nomination. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support

[edit]
  1. Support - TheDaveRoss 20:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Highly trusted and helpful user. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. I generally subscribe to the idea that one user should not be given all the privileges available in the project. However, we need a second checkuser in order to have local powers for TheDaveRoss, and if any user has earned the level of trust that would be requisite for this, it would be Chuck. I nominated him to be a bureaucrat, and he has handled very sticky problems in that role with admirable levelheadedness and attention to detail. I expect no less of him in using the checkuser tool. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 23:31, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Already an experienced sysop and helpful editor. —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 00:48, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Never loses his temper somehow! Equinox ◑ 00:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Almost never... Chuck Entz (talk) 01:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Wyang (talk) 03:08, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 03:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support No doubt in my mind that Chuck is the right choice. --Robbie SWE (talk) 17:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support His username is almost an anagram of "check user" anyway. --Barytonesis (talk) 17:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. support (I hate straw polls, but this is important.) - Amgine/ t·e 18:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC) Check Untz?[reply]
    You may want to read our entry straw poll, because that is very much not what this is. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    On this we may agree to disagree; normally I would call this a beauty pageant. - Amgine/ t·e 19:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    We might need an extra metaphorical sense at beauty pageant. But if I interpret your meaning correctly, that's not the same as a straw poll. I wonder if you actually looked at that entry. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 19:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support --Vahag (talk) 17:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Ks0stm (T•C•E) 23:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 18:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 06:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support I thought he already was one, otherwise I would have mentioned him as a choice in my comment here. --WikiTiki89 21:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support -Xbony2 (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Yes, of course. bd2412 T 02:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support — Ungoliant (falai) 16:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support —suzukaze (t・c) 18:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support -- Chuck has consistently been a positive force in this community. No reservations. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 16:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Redboywild (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support —Palaestrator verborum (loquier) 17:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support — Panda10 (talk) 18:53, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support, of course. Sorry to be so late. - DCDuring (talk) 00:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support for obvious reasons. PseudoSkull (talk) 13:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support - -sche (discuss) 14:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support --Makaokalani (talk) 16:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support — Eru·tuon 19:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support — BukhariSaeed (talk) 09:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for voicing your support for Chuck, however this vote is both late - the vote is closed - and not valid due to account age. - TheDaveRoss 12:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

[edit]

Abstain

[edit]

Decision

[edit]

Passes unanimously, with 31-0-0. Congrats, Chuck. You'll have to give the WMF your info and sign up at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chuck Entz, if you wouldn't mind, please let me know when you are IDed and ready to request access so I can request at the same time. Thanks. - TheDaveRoss 14:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Chuck Entz, you could update Wiktionary:CheckUsers too if you feel like. -WF
Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2017-10/User:Chuck_Entz_for_checkuser&oldid=49611241"