Talk:新冠狀病毒

RFD discussion: August 2020

See Talk:大馬哈#RFD discussion: August 2020.

RFV discussion: August 2020–August 2021

See Talk:大馬哈#RFV discussion: August 2020–August 2021.

RFD discussion: August 2021–August 2023

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

新冠狀病毒

SoP: 新 (new; novel) + 冠狀病毒 (coronavirus). Not only used for SARS-CoV-2: [1] [2] [3]. Similar to 新型冠狀病毒, which was deleted recently through RFD. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 00:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@Justinrleung: If 新冠狀病毒病／新冠状病毒病 (xīn guānzhuàng bìngdú bìng) passed RFV, shouldn't this too? --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 09:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mar vin kaiser: I see what you mean, but this is RFD, not RFV. The reasons for keeping 新冠狀病毒病 at RFV would not apply here technically. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 09:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

(Notifying Atitarev, Tooironic, Fish bowl, Justinrleung, Mar vin kaiser, RcAlex36, The dog2, Frigoris, 沈澄心, 恨国党非蠢即坏, Michael Ly): Opinions? — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 22:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

But in the midst of the pandemic, it's assumed you are referring to COVID-19 when you use this term. The dog2 (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

• RFD kept, no consensus. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 01:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)