Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeydʰ-
Appearance
Proto-Indo-European
[edit]Root
[edit]*bʰeydʰ- (imperfective)[1]
Derived terms
[edit]- *bʰéydʰ-e-ti (thematic root present)
- *bʰéydʰ-e-tor (deponent)
- Proto-Indo-Iranian: *bʰáydʰatay
- Proto-Indo-Aryan: *báydʰatay
- Sanskrit: बाधते (bā́dhate)
- Proto-Indo-Aryan: *báydʰatay
- Proto-Indo-Iranian: *bʰáydʰatay
- *bʰe-bʰóydʰ-e ~ *bʰe-bʰidʰ-ḗr (stative)
- *bʰidʰ-tó-s[2]
- *bʰeydʰ-os
- *bʰoydʰ-éh₂ (“pledge”)
- *bʰeydʰ-ti-s
- *bʰoydʰ-éye-ti
- Proto-Balto-Slavic: *baideitei
- Proto-Slavic: *běditi (see there for further descendants)
- Proto-Germanic: *baidijaną (see there for further descendants)
- Proto-Balto-Slavic: *baideitei
Reconstruction notes
[edit]The Sanskrit forms with long ā can be explained as an irregular development of earlier *ay < *ey/*oy.
References
[edit]- ^ Ringe, Donald (2006) From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A Linguistic History of English; 1)[1], Oxford: Oxford University Press, →ISBN
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Wodtko, Dagmar S., Irslinger, Britta, Schneider, Carolin (2008) “*bʰei̯dʰ-”, in Nomina im indogermanischen Lexikon [Nouns in the Indo-European Lexicon] (in German), Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, page 12
- ^ Trumper, John. "Some Celto‑Albanian isoglosses and their implications." Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond. In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia (2018).