User talk:Imbricitor
Add topicWelcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.
If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:
- Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
- Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
- Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
- If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
- If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
- Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (
~~~~
) which automatically produces your username and timestamp. - You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.
Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! 0DF (talk) 06:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
You’re welcome! :-)
0DF (talk) 06:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Blank lines
[edit]Hi, thanks for your work on Latin. For future entries do bear in mind WT:NORM#Headings, which states that every header should be preceded by a blank line. This also makes it easier for other editors to read your code. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Imbricitor (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Alexius Imbricitōrī SPD
[edit]Salvē plūrimum, docte homō! Vīdī nūperimē quod scrīpstī dē ipsimāgine, et multum placuit. Volēbam scīre unde verbum dēsūmperīs. In proximum optimē valē. 47.13.78.236 17:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Salvus sīs et tū, Alexī. Dē pīpiātōriō verbum dēprōmpsī, atque etiam ex ōre alicuijus nescioquando praesens audīvī. Imbricitor (talk) 18:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Grātiās plūrimās agō quod novum verbum mē docuistī. Tuam virtūtem laudō! Lingua latīna novīs vocābulīs audāciter eget. Alexius Isclanus (talk) 19:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Exīstimō istīus significātiōnis frequentissimam vōcem esse "ipsulum", ut quod verbum fidēlissimē formātiōnem anglicam reddat. Imbricitor (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Rēctissimē monēs. Adde quod ōlim, saltem septem annōs abhinc, didicī dīcere "ipsellum/ipsillum", quod mihi nōn īnfacētē sonat. Alexius Isclanus (talk) 23:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Exīstimō istīus significātiōnis frequentissimam vōcem esse "ipsulum", ut quod verbum fidēlissimē formātiōnem anglicam reddat. Imbricitor (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Grātiās plūrimās agō quod novum verbum mē docuistī. Tuam virtūtem laudō! Lingua latīna novīs vocābulīs audāciter eget. Alexius Isclanus (talk) 19:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi - am I right in thinking that -ι̯ω (-i̯ō) (which you created) is a duplicate of *-ϳω (*-jō)? The latter seems more appropriate to me, given that this is an unattested suffix (or rather, it's unattested in its expanded form), and as far as I understand, the artificial letter ϳ (j) is used to represent the ultra-short iota, rather than the Greek-IPA hybrid which you've used. Do let me know if I'm wrong, though. Theknightwho (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. I didn't know that page existed. Some authors use j(even the normal one), others use the character that I used... My main concern was that this suffix should be mentioned in etymologies of words that were formed using it, e.g. ἐλπίζω (elpízō). Formerly, its etymology was ἐλπίς (elpís) + -ίζω (-ízō), but this is wrong, considering that in formations like ἀνδραποδίζω (andrapodízō) the full suffix is attached to the (dethematicised) stem.
- So yeah, we then ought to replace all mentions of the lemma I created by the one that was already there beforehand. Imbricitor (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)