User talk:Arbitrarily0
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
- Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
- Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
- The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
- We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Wiktionary:Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.
Again, welcome! Mglovesfun (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Interwikis
[edit]Hi, User:Interwicket does interwikis. Users aren't banned from adding them by hand, but it means admins need to mark your edits as patrolled, which is a waste of time for this sort of thing. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks for the welcome! Sorry about the interwiki edits, I didn't think they had to be patrolled ... and about Interwicket. Thanks for letting me know, cheers! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Wiktionary doesn't use these, for many reasons, except for proverbs and phrases with mutliple forms of components. Please see WT:REDIRECT. --EncycloPetey 23:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ouch, sorry! Thanks for letting me know, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 23:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
This is not an allotrope of carbon (which is graphite), but a sodium and manganese containing mineral. --EncycloPetey 23:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Wow! Thanks for bringing this up! I've fixed the major factual error, although it could still use more work from a chemistry expert. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 23:51, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- User:SemperBlotto is our resident chemistry expert (among other areas of expertise), but I don't know whether his expertise extends to this. He should spot the RFC discussion, if it does. --EncycloPetey 23:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
foxtrot
[edit]The dance isn't usually spelled with a capital letter. It certainly not a proper noun. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- My basis for this was w:Foxtrot. The Foxtrot was named after dancer Harry Fox. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, what is your concern. AFAICT the Wikipedia voluntarily uses bad capitalisation, as Wikipedia isn't case sensitive for the first letter. Similarly, The is an alternative capitalisation of the when used as a first word of a sentence. And sometimes people write IN ALL CAPS but we don't create entries for all caps like FOXTROT. It's to avoid reduplication. We let the reader use their brain a bit. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- I understand, but isn't it a proper noun? It is always used as "the Foxtrot/foxtrot" (as opposed to "a waltz"), but more importantly, it's name comes directly from Harry Fox. At the very least, the comic strip Foxtrot should be capitalized, no? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- It's a common noun; it's not a trademark and it can be pluralized (foxtrots). Perhaps if reliable sources were showing this to be often capitalized (say, 30% of the time, excluding first word of a sentence or utterance) it would be justifiable using
{{alternative capitalization of}}. But eponyms can have lowercase initial letters - how about newton? Mglovesfun (talk) 22:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- It's a common noun; it's not a trademark and it can be pluralized (foxtrots). Perhaps if reliable sources were showing this to be often capitalized (say, 30% of the time, excluding first word of a sentence or utterance) it would be justifiable using
- I understand, but isn't it a proper noun? It is always used as "the Foxtrot/foxtrot" (as opposed to "a waltz"), but more importantly, it's name comes directly from Harry Fox. At the very least, the comic strip Foxtrot should be capitalized, no? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, what is your concern. AFAICT the Wikipedia voluntarily uses bad capitalisation, as Wikipedia isn't case sensitive for the first letter. Similarly, The is an alternative capitalisation of the when used as a first word of a sentence. And sometimes people write IN ALL CAPS but we don't create entries for all caps like FOXTROT. It's to avoid reduplication. We let the reader use their brain a bit. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2010 (UTC)