Talk:bagnieć
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vininn126 in topic RFV discussion: December 2023
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
I don't speak Polish. However, these words are listed as a hapax, when Polish is a WDL. So, I guess these need three cites. However, they are both tagged as Middle Polish, so I'm not sure if that's a sign that Mid. Pol. should be its own thing or not. CitationsFreak (talk) 02:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @CitationsFreak In WT:About Polish Middle Polish is listed to be treated as an LDL, and the links to SXVI provide at least a single quote. Vininn126 (talk) 06:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh. Mind if I change WT:WDL to reflect this? CitationsFreak (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @CitationsFreak I suppose a note could be a good idea. Vininn126 (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @CitationsFreak Are we good to say this is RFV-cited? Vininn126 (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- I guess. Weirds me out how pielać has no quotes, however. CitationsFreak (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @CitationsFreak I added it easily, but typically with LDL's even a mention in accepted sources is fine. Vininn126 (talk) 20:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- I guess. Weirds me out how pielać has no quotes, however. CitationsFreak (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @CitationsFreak Are we good to say this is RFV-cited? Vininn126 (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @CitationsFreak I suppose a note could be a good idea. Vininn126 (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh. Mind if I change WT:WDL to reflect this? CitationsFreak (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
RFV passed. Vininn126 (talk) 20:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)