Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/elig
Appearance
Proto-Turkic
[edit]Etymology
[edit]Usually considered to be simplex, however some theories have been thrown around:
- Sevortyan compares the dialectal Turkish elmek (“hand”) and suggets a common root *el-
- Tekin ties the word to *ẹĺ- (“to dig”), stating that the sigmatism didn't occur due to its medial position[1].
- Nişanyan suggets a derivation *ạl- (“to take”) + *-ïg, however note that the word is never attested as being back voweled through history.
The reason behind the disappearence of the final -i in some languages is uncertain but likely due to confusion with the third person singular possessive, compare *tātïg (“taste”), *bẹńi (“brain”) for similar cases.
Siberian descendants show a variant form with "open-e" (ẹlig). Whether ẹlig or elig was the original form is unclear.
Noun
[edit]*elig
Declension
[edit]Declension of *elig
Singular 3) | |
---|---|
Nominative | *elig |
Accusative | *eligig, *eligni1) |
Genitive | *eligniŋ |
Dative | *eligke |
Locative | *eligde |
Ablative | *eligden |
Allative | *eliggerü |
Instrumental 2) | *eligin |
Equative 2) | *eligče |
Similative 2) | *eligleyü |
Comitative 2) | *eligligü |
1) Originally only in pronominal declension.
2) The original instrumental, equative, similative & comitative cases have fallen into disuse in many modern Turkic languages.
3) Plurality is disputed in Proto-Turkic. See also the notes on the Proto-Turkic/Locative-ablative case and plurality page in Wikibooks.
2) The original instrumental, equative, similative & comitative cases have fallen into disuse in many modern Turkic languages.
3) Plurality is disputed in Proto-Turkic. See also the notes on the Proto-Turkic/Locative-ablative case and plurality page in Wikibooks.
Derived terms
[edit]Descendants
[edit]- Oghur: *eliɣ
- Common Turkic: *elig
References
[edit]- ^ Tekin, Talât. “Once More Zetacism and Sigmatism.” Central Asiatic Journal, vol. 23, no. 1/2, Harrassowitz Verlag, 1979, page 135. [1]
- ^ Agyágasi, Klára (2019) Chuvash Historical Phonetics (Turcologica; 117), Wiesbaden: Harrssowitz, page 170
- ^ Agyágasi, Klára (2019) Chuvash Historical Phonetics (Turcologica; 117), Wiesbaden: Harrssowitz, page 210
- ^ Agyágasi, Klára (2019) Chuvash Historical Phonetics (Turcologica; 117), Wiesbaden: Harrssowitz, page 236
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 al-Kashgarî, Mahmud (1072–1074) Besim Atalay, transl., Divanü Lûgat-it-Türk Tercümesi [Translation of the “Compendium of the languages of the Turks”] (Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları; 521) (in Turkish), 1985 edition, volume I, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurmu Basımevi, published 1939–1943, page 72
- Clauson, Gerard (1972) “elig”, in An Etymological Dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pages 140-141
- al-Kashgarî, Mahmud (1072–1074) Besim Atalay, transl., Divanü Lûgat-it-Türk Tercümesi [Translation of the “Compendium of the languages of the Turks”] (Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları; 521) (in Turkish), 1985 edition, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurmu Basımevi, published 1939–1943
- Nişanyan, Sevan (2002–) “el”, in Nişanyan Sözlük
- Räsänen, Martti (1969) Versuch eines etymologischen Wörterbuchs der Türksprachen (in German), Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura, pages 39-40
- Starostin, Sergei, Dybo, Anna, Mudrak, Oleg (2003) “el, -ig”, in Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages (Handbuch der Orientalistik; VIII.8)[2], Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill