Jump to content

Reconstruction:Latin/suta

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
This Latin entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Latin

[edit]

Etymology

[edit]

Generally regarded as coming from Proto-Slavic *sъto, which is ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *ḱm̥tóm.

It has also been proposed that the Slavic *sъto and the Romance *suta were parallel borrowings from some (unattested) Thracian descendant of Proto-Indo-European *ḱm̥tóm.[1]

Pronunciation

[edit]

Noun

[edit]

*suta f (Proto-Balkan-Romance)

  1. hundred

Reconstruction notes

[edit]

Note that the Balkan Romance numerals from 11 to 19 and the multiples of ten from 20 to 90 were calqued from Slavic[2][note 1] (with the exception of Aromanian yinghits < Latin vīgintī). The numeral for 100 could not be calqued from Slavic since *sъto was not a transparent compound like the others.

The adoption of an early Slavic o-neuter as a Balkan Romance a-feminine is regular.[3] Cf. Romanian cerneală, nicovală, vadră.

The adoption of early Slavic /ь/ and /ъ/ as /i/ and /u/ respectively is also reflected in Romanian sticlă, mătu as well as numerous early borrowings into other languages.[4]

*suta has been displaced in Istro-Romanian by a newer Slavic borrowing sto.

Descendants

[edit]
  • Aromanian: sutã
  • Megleno-Romanian: sută
  • Romanian: sută

References

[edit]
  • Loporcaro, Michele & Gardani, Francesco & Giudici, Alberto. 2021. “Contact-induced complexification in the gender system of Istro-Romanian”. Journal of Language Contact. 14: 72–126.
  • Paliga, Sorin. 1988. “Slovansko *sъto – izzivalen problem?”. Slavistična Revija. 36: 349–58.
  • Saenko, Mikhail. 2023. “Праславянские «Редуцированные» и Гласные u и i в словенском говоре Валбурги: Некоторые параллели”. Исследования по славянской диалектологии. 24: 5–39.
  1. ^ Paligan 1988
  2. ^ Loporcaro et al. 2021: 78.
  3. ^ Loporcaro et al. 2021: 78.
  4. ^ Saenko 2023: 21–2
  1. ^ It has been objected that the presence of similar numerals in Albanian may suggest that they continue a Palaeo-Balkan pattern, but no pre-Slavic evidence of this has yet been found. Incidentally, Albanian has a mixed-vigesimal system with no attested parallel in the Balkans.