Wiktionary:Votes/2022-05/sin flattening validation

Voting on: Do we accept the citations for sin flattening as providing sufficient validation for this term as a hotword?

Schedule:

Support I support the support for sin flattening. These are fairly well-established blogs, for the most part. Kiwima (talk) 02:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Binarystep (talk) 03:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Overlordnat1 (talk) 13:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose — [ זכריה קהת ] Zack. — 04:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose cheugy is an example of a former hot word (only passed the year-mark a month back) that is so spicy hot it has twenty-five cites, without lifting a finger. I don't get into hot words very often, but I would not use the proposed basis as the rationale for keeping this entry. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Only the third quote is an actual use; the other quotes have the word followed by its definition. Apart from that I agree with the abstainers that votes are not the way to hold these discussions. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 08:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain Another unnecessary vote that is destroying the established procedures of RfV. - Sarilho1 (talk) 09:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain This discussion should take place at RFV. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 22:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain This issue is not what votes are for. —Mahāgaja · talk 19:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus 3-3-3 (50%). This, that and the other (talk) 01:54, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]