User talk:Pingalaka

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! -- mādhavpaṇḍit (talk) 11:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

@माधवपंडित: Thanks! - Pingalaka (talk) 04:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

sa-3

Wow! How did you learn so much Sanskrit? —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 14:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

@Aryamanarora: Ha! Maybe sa-3 is a bit ambitious, as I'm not sure what qualifies for each level. I took a few years' coursework in college and pursued it on my own afterwards, later self-studying PIE. That being said, I have a lot to learn from your talk page (thanks for the detailed explanations to other users' questions!) - Pingalaka (talk) 04:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

(Sorry for the late reply!) Even sa-2 is really impressive, I hope to reach it some day... And no problem! I love editing around here, and seeing Indian-language editors is really great since there are so few (for now). —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 01:48, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Also, I'm like an ine-pro-0.3, but isn't the Neogrammarian school of thought considered outdated by most PIE linguists nowadays? —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 01:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@Aryamanarora: I think it's outdated if one wants to consider sound laws as always exceptionless, but we generally operate under that assumption when doing most reconstructions anyways, right? To be honest, it seems I don't know as much as my Babel boxes suggest, so I'd be interested in any good literature on these topics - Pingalaka (talk) 22:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

[1]? Mayrhofer's dictionaries are nice too. And anything by Lubotsky. —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 22:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Sulk

@Pingalaka The P.I.E. reconstruction which you presented is excellent. However, the semantics do not tie up; and this is a prime example of a tenuous root assumption (that may very well not exist) being derived from a stock root that declines from the appropriate sense. I respect that you no doubt have considerably deeper experience in presenting roots than I; but after 47 years of interest in the field of etymology one's instincts as to what is acceptable and what is not, have been sharpened. The stringent guidelines that I compiled for myself on one's user page prevent most, if not all, errors from happening. Every wrong or false etymology that I had presented in the past has broken at least one of those rules! Kind regards. Andrew H. Gray 08:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Andrew (talk)