User talk:DanPMK
Add topicWelcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.
If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:
- Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
- Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
- Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
- If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
- If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
- Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (
~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp. - You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.
Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary!
We don't
[edit]Add translations for foreign-language words, only for English ones. Have a look at some of the links above. Ƿidsiþ 09:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, my mistake, you're adding it as an English-language term. That should be fine. Criteria for inclusion require three sourced citations in recorded media, but I'm pretty sure that wouldn't be a problem here. Ƿidsiþ 09:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- I see, thanks. And yeah, a simple search on any of the major news sites gives plenty of references. - MK (t/c) 12:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Re: your userpage
[edit]Granted, I'm not very good with comparative Asian phonology, but I think your charts are missing the effects of tonogenesis. For example, for 北, I see that the loss of the -k in Mandarin matches the formation of a new tone, in this case the third tone. I intepret the two Sino-Korean readings as being borrowings from different times, one from Middle Chinese (?) when the -k was still present and tonogenesis was at a minimum, and one during the formation of early modern Mandarin during the period of the Chinese protectorate. Of course, Korean is nontonal, so each time it gets normalized to the toneless romanization. Just a thought. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 00:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting. I'm not much of a tonologist, I'll have to ask a friend of mine. I haven't looked at the charts in forever, I think they need a bit of an upgrade. - MK (t/c) 01:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)