User talk:Akiaveliara
Add topicHej
[edit]hej Akiraveliara (talk) 07:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Editing
[edit]Hi, please stick to editing languages you are competent enough to edit in. You're editing in a bunch of different languages, and I find it hard to believe you know all of them enough to make useful contributions without a ton of mistakes. β SURJECTION / T / C / L / 20:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Reiterating this: you keep making basic mistakes like Special:Diff/82801875. Please stick to editing languages you actually speak and check your own contributions before saving them, or you may be blocked. β SURJECTION / T / C / L / 17:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Unattested forms of Gothic verbs (re: π°π½π°π΅πΉπΈπΉπ)
[edit]We don't include unattested forms for Gothic (see WT:AGOT#Unattested non-lemma forms). I've speedy-deleted it for now. β Mnemosientje (t Β· c) 10:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Audio
[edit]Don't add audio to a language that's meant for another language, like chlap. Vininn126 (talk) 14:53, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
one of your edits
[edit]Why would you do this? Polomo47 (talk) 23:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Polomo47,
- Thanks for your message! I removed the
{{rfd|pt}}template because when I checked Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Italic, it displayed a message saying the topic couldnβt be found, which led me to believe the debate had finished. I now realize that the discussion about te amo and amo-te might still be active, especially since they were grouped together with eu te amo for deletion consideration due to their similarity. - I see now that this was a mistake, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. If itβs appropriate, Iβd be happy to help restore the template or assist in any way to align with the current discussion.
- Best regards, Akiaveliara (talk) 07:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I see. I've already restored the template, so there's nothing you need to do on that front.
- About the link saying "topic not found", that is indeed troublesome, and usually I think we just format the RFD like I did. More recently, though, I've seen a different format that makes the link work correctly (by writing two different headings), and I'll probably do it like that when I next bundle RfV/RfDs. Polomo47 (talk) 17:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the link sv:sv-adj you added in Template:sv-adj. If you would like to add a trans-wiki link for the Swedish template sv:Mall:sv-adj, please edit the corresponding Wikidata pages (d:Q33493559 and d:Q38073813). TongcyDai (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)