Template talk:sk-conj

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 1 year ago by TomášPolonec in topic Hnať
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Remake

[edit]

Can we or can I please get someone to help me redo this template? It's far too cluttered and from what I can tell it hasn't been used properly in the articles I've read. A much better template exists on the Slovak Wiktionary, and I think it'd be a good idea to import that one and use it here. I'd be happy to help redoing the template here, if so desired. Mulder1982 (talk) 03:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Gerund

[edit]

I'm a bit template-phobic to fix this myself but the gerund (robenie) is missing from the template. The form previously marked as a gerund ending in -iac/-úc is called a transgressive. filelakeshoe (holla) 08:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Filelakeshoe: Done Done! --TomášPolonec (talk) 11:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hnať

[edit]

i've been trying to use this template for the word hnať but most forms other than the l participles are very irregular (like czech hnát & various slavic cognates) and i cant figure out how to change the other forms to reflect that :(

Filipinojalapeno (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Filipinojalapeno: Thank you for the notice, I have fixed it, it should work now. Try this: {{sk-conj|impf|3d}}. --TomášPolonec (talk) 20:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
P.S. When you create new Slovak entries, please add also the sections for pronounciation and "further reading", it uses mostly automatic templates, see e.g. here. --TomášPolonec (talk) 20:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
'sk-conj to je čo za jebnutú šablónu? '
V slovenčine totiž neexistuje žiaden past perfect (m./f./n.)
Spojenie ako "bola som čítala" a podobné koniny, čo tá šablona generuje sú nezmysel.
"past perfect" v tej šablóne proste nemá čo hľadať.
Žiadne také patvary v slovenčine nemáme!
la som čítala"
ruje sú nezmysel. 178.23.90.125 21:25, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@178.23.90.125: Platná kodifikačná príručka Morfológia slovenského jazyka na str. 477-478 jasne popisuje tvorbu predminulého času (antepréterita) a na str. 532-534 jeho funkciu. Vaše vulgárnosti teda vôbec nie sú namieste, treba si to naštudovať. --TomášPolonec (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply