Talk:sauga

RFV discussion: June 2022

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

sauga

Removed out of process. —Svārtava (t/u) • 01:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Note that this is already at Sauga, with quotations. 70.172.194.25 01:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Delete. It's a place name and should be capitalized (unless it's stylistic or informal writing). I don't think we would include toronto as an entry, for example. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 02:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Move to RFD and delete - concur with @Justinrleung. It is trivial to find examples of place names being used without a capital letter, but these aren't diminutive forms and the lack of capitalisation is not particular to the word, as it simply indicates the writer isn't using capitals in general. In other words, even if assume MTE has totally different capitalisation rules, you aren't going to find examples where this particular word stands out as nonstandard for its lack of capitalisation. Compare bell hooks - a pen name - for a genuine example of nonstandard capitalisation in a proper noun, which should always be written entirely in lowercase. Theknightwho (talk) 11:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

• Speedied, as the one who reverted the removal. —Svārtava (t/u) • 11:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)