Jump to content

Talk:endeavour

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 10 years ago by -sche in topic RFM discussion: April 2013–March 2014

RFM discussion: April 2013–March 2014

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


These no longer say the same thing. Is there really no way we can merge them, using {{alternative form of}}? Mglovesfun (talk) 09:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Of course we can, the question is whether there is a willingness to do so, and if so, which form gets labeled the {{alternative form of}} the other. FWIW, endeavor is older by 9 minutes. —Angr 21:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
I wish we could resolve this kind of redundant entry somehow. It’s a problem in choosing which senses apply, and can become unresolvaby confusing when variations represent regional differences, but also common and proper nouns and “proper” adjectives, and varying number. Even more confusing when some of the senses are plural of or alternative form of the other. E.g., aboriginal/Aboriginal, labour/Labour/labor/Labor, First Nation/First Nations.
Our lemmas aren’t really lemmas, so sometimes the reader may have to jump between two or three entries to actually read a comprehensive definition of a term.. Michael Z. 2013-04-17 22:27 z
Merged. - -sche (discuss) 20:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply