Talk:𠹌
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by Justinrleung in topic RFV discussion: November 2017–August 2020
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Rfv for Cantonese. Dokurrat (talk) 03:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Dokurrat: The definitions come from the Unihan Database, which got their definitions from "The Representation of Cantonese with Chinese Characters". Here are the sources cited in the article:
- lan2 (variant of 𨶙): 洪興仔 #21 殺入筲箕灣
- lang1 (used in 𠮩𠹌/溜𠹌): Hong Kong Judiciary unpublished glossary #4; 粵語書寫問題研究項目
- lang3 (used in 半𠹌𠼰): Hong Kong Judiciary unpublished glossary #4 (I would pronounce this as lang1.)
- nang3 (join, link, connect): A Study of Cantonese Words (Zeng Zifan), 粵語書寫問題研究項目
- — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung: So, If my understanding is right, all pronunciations have passed rfv; sense "variant of 𨶙" has passed rfv. And sense "uncommon, rare" is not verified (yet). Dokurrat (talk) 05:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- RFV is generally not used for pronunciations. "Variant of 𨶙" doesn't pass RFV technically; see WT:ATTEST. "Uncommon, rare" is the definition for 𠮩𠹌/溜𠹌; it's not used by itself, so there should be a
{{zh-only}}. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 05:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- RFV is generally not used for pronunciations. "Variant of 𨶙" doesn't pass RFV technically; see WT:ATTEST. "Uncommon, rare" is the definition for 𠮩𠹌/溜𠹌; it's not used by itself, so there should be a
- @Justinrleung: So, If my understanding is right, all pronunciations have passed rfv; sense "variant of 𨶙" has passed rfv. And sense "uncommon, rare" is not verified (yet). Dokurrat (talk) 05:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- RFV passed. Everything should be verified since Cantonese is no longer considered WT:WDL. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 07:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)