Talk:皮卡丘

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Justinrleung in topic RFV discussion: June 2022
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: November–December 2021

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: Picacho. The Chinese Wikipedia page has been moved to 皮卡喬. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 05:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


RFD discussion: July 2021–June 2022

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


WT:FICTION. -- 08:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Keep, send to WT:RFVN regarding WT:FICTION. --Astova (talk) 21:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Pikachu": WT:FICTION. -- 08:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@沈澄心: But isn't that the English entry of Pikachu is included here? If WT:FICTION is proposed as a reason for deletion, then the English entry should also be addressed here.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Keep. I've added some quotes that aren't (entirely) in the Pokemon context. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 05:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


RFV discussion: June 2022

[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Chinese. Moved from WT:RFDN, where WT:FICTION was invoked for deletion. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 23:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cited. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 00:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply