Talk:白苹
Add topicLatest comment: 7 months ago by Justinrleung in topic RFD discussion: January–May 2024
The word should not have such a simplifed entry
[edit]It's proscribed. Textbooks in Mainland China are written like this: 肠断白𬞟洲（溫庭筠《望江南》）and I already submitted {{rfd}} according to the guideline. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 05:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Chinese. Non-standard simplified form. I just created a page with the right simplified form and bidirectionally linked it to the main entry 白蘋. Now this old page created by a bot should be able to get deleted. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 05:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the automatic simplification as in Template:zh-x, Template:zh-l, etc, should get corrected, too, yet I don't know how. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Since it's a rare case of 1:2 mapping between traditional and simplified and 蘋 -> 苹 is much more common than 蘋 -> 𬞟, I don't think the automatic simplification will be corrected. We'll just have to deal with it manually. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 15:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung @Maraschino Cherry Are we sure this never gets used as a nonstandard simplified form? I can certainly see 白蘋洲 / 白𬞟洲 being referred to as 白苹洲. Theknightwho (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Part of this is due to automatic conversion between traditional and simplified, and the other part is that many years ago the simplified character 𬞟 is difficult to input and show, many devices and input methods just don't support it. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Theknightwho, Maraschino Cherry: I guess it's more of an RFV issue then. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 19:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung @Maraschino Cherry Alright - let's move the discussion to WT:RFVCJK. If it passes, we can add it to zh-forms with
ns=. Theknightwho (talk) 23:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung @Maraschino Cherry Alright - let's move the discussion to WT:RFVCJK. If it passes, we can add it to zh-forms with
- @Theknightwho, Maraschino Cherry: I guess it's more of an RFV issue then. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 19:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Part of this is due to automatic conversion between traditional and simplified, and the other part is that many years ago the simplified character 𬞟 is difficult to input and show, many devices and input methods just don't support it. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung @Maraschino Cherry Are we sure this never gets used as a nonstandard simplified form? I can certainly see 白蘋洲 / 白𬞟洲 being referred to as 白苹洲. Theknightwho (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Since it's a rare case of 1:2 mapping between traditional and simplified and 蘋 -> 苹 is much more common than 蘋 -> 𬞟, I don't think the automatic simplification will be corrected. We'll just have to deal with it manually. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 15:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Moved to RFV. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 18:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)