Talk:刻畫
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Wyang
@Justinrleung Could you check the Cantonese pronunciation here? Thanks! Wyang (talk) 03:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Wyang: I'm not really sure, but it might be hak1 waak6. @Kc kennylau, any ideas? — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 06:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Wyang, Justinrleung: I read it as haak1 waak6. --kc_kennylau (talk) 09:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Kc kennylau: Alright, thanks! AFAIK, haak1 is just a variant for hak1, so I think we should have ha(a)k1 waak6. The main question is if waa6-2 (from Cantodict) is valid. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 16:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Justin and Kenny. Wyang (talk) 04:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Kc kennylau: Alright, thanks! AFAIK, haak1 is just a variant for hak1, so I think we should have ha(a)k1 waak6. The main question is if waa6-2 (from Cantodict) is valid. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 16:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Wyang, Justinrleung: I read it as haak1 waak6. --kc_kennylau (talk) 09:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)