Talk:ब्रूयते
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Chuck Entz in topic RFD discussion: October 2024
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Sanskrit. Supposed passive verb for ब्रू (brū), but isn't mentioned anywhere, might be a misinterpretation of 'brūyāsta' (which is either a precative/benedictive, or itself a misreading). Exarchus (talk) 16:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Cited, also here is a dictionary result for it as well. – Svārtava (tɕ) 14:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll remove the rfd, but I do think this only occurs in 'modern'/'new' Sanskrit. The classical way of saying would be उच्यते (ucyate) (I'll make a page for that btw), for which there are thousans of attestations.
- Kept Exarchus (talk) 14:51, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Exarchus: for future reference, if you don't think it exists, you should use WT:RFVN. Only reconstructions use WT:RFDR because theyre inherently not attested (and other namespaces use WT:RFDO, because they're not covered by WT:CFI). Chuck Entz (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)