Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/wérsēn
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Victar in topic *h₂wers-
Reconstruction
[edit]@Victar: Hi. Compare with Proto-Northeast Caucasian *weršē. In Proto-Nakh, it is reconstructed as follows *borš (“bull-calf”). In Proto-Lezghian, the semantics are: man, husband. Should we add this reconstruction? Gnosandes (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Gnosandes: What's your source? Also, why are you reconstructing Proto-Avaro-Andian with no descendants? --
{{victar|talk}}19:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)- @Victar: We have only one reconstruction. Where did I reconstruct without descendants? Gnosandes (talk) 22:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Gnosandes: I'll clarify my questions. What is the source for PNC being a borrowing, and particularly from PII, and the reconstruction itself? Why did you reconstruct Proto-Avaro-Andian with no descendants listed in the Descendants tree? --
{{victar|talk}}23:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC) - I see it was
{{R:cau:NCED|*wĕršē}}and I've added the needed source. --{{victar|talk}}01:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Gnosandes: I'll clarify my questions. What is the source for PNC being a borrowing, and particularly from PII, and the reconstruction itself? Why did you reconstruct Proto-Avaro-Andian with no descendants listed in the Descendants tree? --
- @Victar: We have only one reconstruction. Where did I reconstruct without descendants? Gnosandes (talk) 22:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
*h₂wers-
[edit]do we mean Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₁wers-? if the reconstructions dont line up, this is a problem, because i doubt we could have two such roots in PIE. —Soap— 09:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Soap: Yes, if you see RC:Proto-Indo-European/h₁wers-, *h₂wers- is an alternative reconstruction. --
{{victar|talk}}01:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)