Reconstruction:Proto-Mongolic/čïlaxun
Appearance
Proto-Mongolic
[edit]Etymology
[edit]Internal reconstruction points to earlier *čïlapun, potentially from an unknown verb *čïla-.
Traditionally connected to Turkic (cf. Chuvash чул (čul)) and Korean (cf. 돌 (dol)). However, according to Doerfer (1965), similarities to Proto-Turkic *tāĺ point to an early borrowing rather than inheritance. His argument is seconded by Vovin (2005), in his debunking of the "Altaic hypothesis".
Noun
[edit]*čïlaxun
See also
[edit]Descendants
[edit]- Middle Mongol:
- Mongolian:
- Buryat: шулуу(н) (šuluu(n))
- Khamnigan Mongol: čiluu(n), čuluu(n)
- Kalmyk: чолун (çolun)
- Daur: coloo
- East Yugur: ciluu
- Kangjia: cilo
References
[edit]- Doerfer, Gerhard (1965) Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen [Turkic and Mongolian Elements in New Persian] (Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur: Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission; 19)[1] (in German), volume 2, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, page 437
- Nugteren, Hans (2011) Mongolic phonology and the Qinghai-Gansu languages (dissertation)[2], Utrecht: LOT, page 302
- Räsänen, Martti (1969) Versuch eines etymologischen Wörterbuchs der Türksprachen (in German), Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura, page 466
- Vovin, Alexander (2005): "The end of the Altaic controversy" [review of Starostin et al. (2003)]. Central Asiatic Journal volume 49, issue 1, pages 111-112.