witzchoura

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
See also: witz-choura

English

[edit]

Etymology

[edit]
PIE word
*wĺ̥kʷos
An 1813 illustration of a witzchoura from the back.

Borrowed from French witzchoura (obsolete), vitchoura (witzchoura), from Polish wilczura ((archaic) wolfskin), from wilczy (wolf-like, lupine) (ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *wĺ̥kʷos (wolf)) + -ura (suffix forming feminine nouns).[1]

Pronunciation

[edit]

Noun

[edit]

witzchoura (plural witzchouras)

  1. (historical) A woman's fur-lined cloak, mantle, or pelisse with large sleeves, worn during the early 19th century.
    • 1817 January 1, “The Universal Advertising Sheet in La Belle Assemblee”, in La Belle Assemblée; being Bell’s Court and Fashionable Magazine (New and Improved Series), volume XIV, number 91, London: [] John Bell, [], →OCLC, page 41, column 1:
      THE GREATEST NOVELTY IN DRESS FOR THE PRESENT PERIOD, is the ENGLISH WITZCHOURA, being the most indispensible[sic] appendage to Dress that can be conceived. It protects the wearer from the inclemencies of the weather—prevents dress from being deranged—and forms a most elegant and useful exterior covering for Evening Parties, the Theatre, Walking, or Riding. Its make is perfectly unique. A Chapeau Bras is attached to the Witzchoura, made in a very novel manner.
    • 1821, chapter X, in Scheming; [], volume III, London: Henry Colburn and Co., [], →OCLC, pages 160–161:
      "I'll just wrap myself up, and be ready in an instant; that old yellow witzchoura," pointing to one that lay on a chair close by Mrs. Brayforth, "is all I shall put on," she was going to add; but that old lady screamed aloud, "'Old yellow witch houra!' call me an old witch indeed! []"
    • 1826, “A Summary of the Fashions for the Last Six Months”, in Supplement to La Belle Assemblée, or Court and Fashionable Magazine (New Series), volume IV, London: Geo[rge] B[yrom] Whittaker, []; Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, →OCLC, page 315:
      The loose Polonese sleeve, lined and trimmed with fur, was worn with Witzchouras: the sleeve underneath fitted close to the arm.
    • 1828 December 31, “Fashions. Description of the Engravings.”, in The Lady’s Magazine; or, Mirror of the Belles-lettres, Fine Arts, Music, Drama, Fashions, &c., volume IX (New Series), London: [] John Merriman, [], →OCLC, page 666:
      This [the carriage dress], with some becoming alterations, is the Witzchoura-pelisse; and that which we have the pleasure of presenting a fac-simile of to our readers, is of light lavender satin, with a very broad border of ermine.
    • 1833, “The Ladies’ Toilet”, in The Ladies’ Pocket Magazine, part 1, London: Joseph Robins [], →OCLC, page 38:
      Mantles are still predominant in carriage dress, and a few witchouras have been introduced. This is a revived fashion, and, we believe, was originally a Russian one. The witchoura is a very ample mantle, made with a very deep collar, and cape, and long, loose sleeves. The mantle and sleeves are lined with fur, and if that is of a very expensive kind, the collar and cape are composed of it; but if not, velvet, or the material of the cloak, is employed for them.
    • 1882, Augustin Challamel, “Reign of Louis XVIII. and Charles X. 1815 to 1830.”, in Mrs. Cashel Hoey, John Lillie, transl., The History of Fashion in France; or, The Dress of Women from the Gallo-Roman Period to the Present Time. [], London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle, & Rivington, [], →OCLC, page 202:
      Velvet "toques" were in favour; likewise velvet "witchouras," chinchilla muffs, bodices draped "à la Sévigné;" []
    • 1886, Octave Uzanne, “The Grand Coquettes of the First Empire”, in The Frenchwoman of the Century: Fashions—Manners—Usages [], London: John C. Nimmo [], →OCLC, page 111:
      Furs, especially ermine, were worn in profusion from 1810 to 1814; nothing was seen but robes lined with ermine, witzchouras, spencers, redingotes, ermine muffs; women covered themselves as much as they were formerly uncovered.
    • 1937, C[ecil] Willett Cunnington, “From Romance to Sentiment in the ’30’s”, in English Women’s Clothing in the Nineteenth Century [], New York, N.Y.: Dover Publications, published 2013, →ISBN, page 112:
      Mantles with shawl patterns; the pelerine-cape is deeper with two points in front and one behind; the over cape is smaller in the form of a falling collar. Witzchoura Mantles revived (Winter).
    • 1979, Marybelle S. Bigelow, “Romanticism and the Industrial Age (1815–1870)”, in Fashion in History: Western Dress, Prehistoric to Present, 2nd edition, Minneapolis, Minn.: Burgess Publishing Company, →ISBN, page 243, column 2:
      The witchoura, or fur coat, continued in fashion, although the design of the sleeves, bodice, and skirt were modified to correspond to the changing silhouette of the gowns worn beneath.
    • 1989, Philippe Séguy, “Costume in the Age of Napoleon”, in Katell le Bourhis, editor, The Age of Napoleon: Costume from Revolution to Empire 1789–1815, New York, N.Y.: The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Harry N. Abrams, →ISBN, page 106:
      The witzchouras, taking its name from central Europe, a sort of fur redingote-cum-overcoat, with a raised collar and fur hood had neither belt nor pleats and made its appearance in 1808.
    • 2014, Mary Ellen Snodgrass, “Pockets”, in World Clothing and Fashion: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Social Influence, volume 2, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, New York, N.Y.: Routledge, published 2015, →ISBN, page 458:
      During the Napoleonic Era (1799–1815) in Europe, women's fashions abandoned the inside pocket for the columnar chemise dress and Polish Witzchoura mantle, a fur-edged cloak with open sleeves.
    • 2018, Christine Haynes, “Cosmopolitanism”, in Our Friends the Enemies: The Occupation of France after Napoleon, Cambridge, Mass., London: Harvard University Press, →ISBN, part II (Friends?), page 193:
      Meanwhile, from Russia French women adopted "witz-chouras," or fur-lined (usually wolf) coats.

Alternative forms

[edit]

Translations

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Compare † witzchoura, n.”, in OED Online Paid subscription required, Oxford: Oxford University Press, March 2021.

Further reading

[edit]