gigatrend
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
English
[edit]Etymology
[edit]From giga- + trend, using next larger SI prefix from megatrend.
Noun
[edit]gigatrend (plural gigatrends)
- A very major trend.
- 1982, Christopher Kaiser, “Course Syllabus: Christianity in a Technological Society”, in Science, Technology & Society[1], Lehigh University, page 66:
- Gigatrends: The Boundary Conditions of Modern Life and their Formation
- 1997 February 28, Ervin László with Christopher Laszlo, The Insight Edge: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Evolutionary Management, Westport: Quorum Books, →ISBN, →LCCN, →OCLC, →OL, page 16:
- An evolutionary gigatrend is far more basic and decisive than any trend currently known to managers and economists, including the megatrends popularized by John Naisbitt in the 1980s.
- 2003, David C. Wyld, “Transforming Procurement: The Potential of Auctions”, in Mark A. Abramson, Roland S. Harris, editors, The Procurement Revolution, new edition, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, →ISBN, →OL, page 313:
- Certainly, e-government is such a gigatrend […] being just one of the myriad of evident, tangible ways that the Internet is changing relationships between individuals, businesses, and the government.
- 2006 October 6, Alan Wittbecker, Good Forestry from Good Theories and Good Practices: Essays on Ecological Forestry & Ecological Design, Cambridge Books, →ISBN, →OCLC, →OL:
- Although many gigatrends are interrelated, they can be discussed is[sic] several categories: human populations, ecosystems and forest ecosystems, human economics and technology, and forest technology and management.
- 2010 November 30, Jan-Eric Furubo with Ove Karlsson Vestman, “Evaluation: For Public Good or Professional Power?”, in Pearl Eliadis, Jan-Eric Furubo, Steve Jacob, editors, Evaluation: Seeking Truth or Power? (Comparative Policy Evaluation, Volume 17), New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, →ISBN, →LCCN, →OCLC, page 14:
- This gigatrend is based in part on the notion of a society underpinned by a series of dichotomies between values and empirical facts, and between goals and means, etc.