Jump to content

Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2022-11/User:Overlordnat1 for admin

Add links
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary

User:Overlordnat1 for admin

[edit]

Nomination: I hereby nominate Overlordnat1 (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.

Schedule:

Acceptance:

  • Languages: en, fr-2
  • Timezone: UTC+0 GMT

I accept. It would be an honour to become an administrator. --Overlordnat1 (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support

[edit]
  1. Support Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes 00:29, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Ok, ok, ok Fay Freak (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Megathon7 (talk) 02:06, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support User has been friendly in discussions and generally aims to find a resolution. Vininn126 (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support, see no reason to think they would misuse the tools and they're active in RFV etc. so they can make use of them. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 13:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

[edit]
  1. Oppose Wonderfool nominee is an auto-oppose for me. We need a rule to prevent blocked users from creating votes. --Skiulinamo (talk) 02:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Many users suffer from this aversion, I suffered violent opposition from User:Metaknowledge, and never became an admin, and am no longer interested. DonnanZ (talk) 11:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose. I think having made only 863 mainspace edits is insufficient for this role. This is also reflected in the fact that they still make quite a number of formatting mistakes. If it weren't for this, I wouldn't be opposed. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 12:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Probably, good that I did not consider the number before voting. I don’t think that this is reflected there however—the rest was put to so much attention to that two things invisible to the reader were forgotten (I won’t even count the missed whitespace). I also make it explicit that Citations: namespace contributions, though there be 66, count as much as mainspace contributions. In this case the appearance on discussion pages (1,040 Wiktionary and 295 Talk pages), answering lots of requests, and contribution summaries, were also reckoned by me suffícient to extrapolate future reasonable behaviour—we would as well have concerns if someone barely appears in any discussion to make room for judgment. But now I see why few people even noticed the user enough to vote here. Fay Freak (talk) 21:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Weak oppose per Fytcha. Sorry, I think more activity would be needed from an admin candidate. —Svārtava (talk) • 03:35, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose per previous opposers. brittletheories (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain

[edit]

Decision

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2022-11/User:Overlordnat1_for_admin&oldid=70698239"