Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-11/User:Gamren for admin

Nomination: I hereby nominate Gamren (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.

Schedule:

Support as nominator. Equinox ◑ 12:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Ungoliant ^(falai) 11:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support on the condition that the editor will lose admin flag if, in future, someone creates a vote that seeks to confirm him in the adminship and the vote does not achieve consensus for keeping adminship; oppose to the extent the condition is not met. This is nothing personal; it is as a matter of general useful principle. A clarification: My position is that my condition only applies if passing of the vote depends on support of editors who used this condition.
Note: When admins are easy to desysop, it is easier to take risks, enadmin even relatively new contributors and see how they perform in their admin roles. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, here are new pages by Gamren, tools.wmflabs.org. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support a bit soon, but hey, whatevah. -Xbony2 (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain: A little too soon, I think. DonnanZ (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain. Hasn't been around that long and hasn't made that many edits. I see no reason to oppose, however. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 19:45, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~# Abstain I have never seen this user, but we've only had one new admin in 2016, so we could definitely use a new one. Juan the fool (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Passes 4-0-2. @Chuck Entz —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 06:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Chuck Entz (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contents