Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status

User:Tbot for bot status

• Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:Tbot for the following purposes:

  Update existing {{t}} templates, changing t to t- or t+ as needed.

  Add the t template to entries where useful.

  Documentation at User:Tbot

  Robert Ullmann 08:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

• Vote ends: 12 November 2007 23:59 UTC
• Vote started: 08:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

• Discussion:

  WT:GP

  User talk:Tbot

  You may note Tbot creating some translation entries. This is experimental; all such entries are in Category:Tbot entries. This function is not part of the present vote. When I have something reasonable set up to look at, it can be discussed and then voted on separately. Robert Ullmann 01:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Support

1. Support —Ruakh_TALK 15:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
2. Support Connel MacKenzie 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC) --Connel MacKenzie 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
3. Support Robert Ullmann 23:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
4. Support \Mike 18:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
5. Support — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 16:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC) yay
6. Support Conrad.Irwin 23:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
7. Support DAVilla 03:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC) Yea!
8. Support. bd2412 T 00:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
9. Support EncycloPetey 02:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC) For the record, I think it's a bad idea for a bot to create translational entries, even though this is not part of the present vote.

   It would be a bad idea for a bot to create entries that went unchecked; if they just appeared as "normal" entries some of the oddities might persist for a long time. (Some are quite amusing: Noun אסלה (aslá) f. 1. throne (lavatory or toilet) ... ;-). Creating entries that someone can then look at and expand is useful. It may depend largely on who is working on the language. Robert Ullmann 04:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

10. Support Rod (A. Smith) 01:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
11. Support Jyril 09:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
12. Support Cynewulf 18:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Even though it's already past the deadline.

Abstain

1. Abstain —Saltmarsh^Talk 15:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC) I would be inclined to vote for this but since all implications of the vote might be over my head I will just abstain.

Decision

• Passes 9-0-1 with 3 late votes also in support. DAVilla 03:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)