Wiktionary:Votes/2022-05/troid validation

Voting on: Do we accept the provided citations as sufficient support for the term troid?

Schedule:

Support We are supposed to be descriptionist, not prescriptionist. Kiwima (talk) 21:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Binarystep (talk) 03:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for as long as:
- the citation templates have not been filled out with enough bibliographic information, such as the subreddit and post title;
- no |archiveurl= for the Wayback Machine or similar service has been included (see my vote comment at the "FaCIAbook" vote);
- there is not enough context in the given quotes to demonstrate that they support the sense at hand.
Yes I know I can fix these things myself, but I feel like I should make some noise and be a little bit annoying now, so I don't end up being the one on whose shoulders it falls to tidy these up for all eternity. Happy to support if these issues are addressed. This, that and the other (talk) 02:17, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — [ זכריה קהת ] Zack. — 04:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per my statements on talk. - -sche (discuss) 14:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per This, that and the other. AG202 (talk) 20:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain Another unnecessary vote that is destroying the established procedures of RfV. - Sarilho1 (talk) 09:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain This discussion should take place at RFV. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 22:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain This issue is not what votes are for. —Mahāgaja · talk 19:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails 2-4-3 (33%). This, that and the other (talk) 01:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]