Esperanto

I know technically anything can be a valid Esperanto word through the Esperanto systems of derivation, but you've been adding a lot of unattested 'hyponyms' which is against the wiktionary policy of "only 'real' words". Basically if a word hasn't been used in Esperanto writing in the past, it doesn't get added here. So... I'm going to be a dick and revert these things, and if you really want them to be added, you need to make sure that they have been used in writing before. — [Ric Laurent] — 10:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry mate, I wasn't aware of this policy. No worries. Pikolas 13:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, check out WT:CFI. It probably sucks and won't answer any real questions because it's a policy page, but it *might* help lol. Thanks for understanding, I know I get pissed when people revert shit I've spent hours on. — [Ric Laurent] — 14:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)