Jump to content

Talk:xiao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Mx. Granger in topic RFV discussion: September–November 2017

RFV discussion: September–November 2017

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: "signifying a little one, junior, small guy, younger person. Usually is attached to a name" DTLHS (talk) 22:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've usually seen it as Xiao. Here are some quotes:
I haven't looked very hard, but I'm certain more citations of the capitalized form exist. It's a little tricky to filter out uses of the surname Xiao. I haven't seen any unambiguous non-italicized uses of the lowercase form. —Granger (talk · contribs) 01:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
None of those could really be called "adjectival" uses either. DTLHS (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
No, I think I would call it a proper noun in English. —Granger (talk · contribs) 01:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
But is it English? In the quotes above, it seems to be part of a discussion of the usage of Chinese (xiǎo). Note, for example 'Xiao, literally "little,"', which seems an awful lot like someone translating a Mandarin term into English. I'm not so sure that misspelling the pinyin by omitting the tone is enough to make it English. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
It's true that the quotes above all explicitly discuss the origin of the word. I'm certain uses exist that do not discuss the origin of the word, and just use it as part of a name without remarking on it, but it's difficult to distinguish those uses from uses of the surname Xiao. (The only way I can think of that I would be able to distinguish those kinds of uses from the surname would be to find a book that introduces a character as, for instance, "Wang Ting", and then has other characters refer to them informally as "Xiao Wang". I haven't been able to find uses like that. Alternatively if someone has a good knowledge of Chinese surnames and given names they might possibly be able to find a use of Xiao X where X is unambiguously a surname and not a given name, but my knowledge of Chinese names is not that good.) But as long as the word is used in running text without italics, I don't think a parenthetical explanation should disqualify the citation (compare the "jib" example at WT:CFI). —Granger (talk · contribs) 14:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed None of the quotes treats the word as English. Kiwima (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

What makes you say that? "the boy, Xiao Liu, and I would play Chinese chess" certainly looks like English to me. —Granger (talk · contribs) 01:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
That is not the sense being questioned. Add it as a proper noun if you want. DTLHS (talk) 01:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Okay, done. —Granger (talk · contribs) 01:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply