Talk:tábąąh jádí
Latest comment: 10 years ago by -sche in topic RFV
RFV
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Are there any non-protologistic entries in Category:nv:Antelopes? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- I think you missed the fact that this appears in the Navajo Wikipedia. I can see sources for this, those few. I don't think that this needs verification. Razorflame 22:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- The Navajo WP doesn't cite any sources, though, does it? Articles on other Wikimedia sites do not in and of themselves verify terms. The Navajo editors over on nv.WP may have made the term up—and the Navajo may be fine with that, but we don't accept terms in any language until they've entered some kind of use, or at least been mentioned somewhere durable. After all, if this term is only used in the nv.WP article on the animal, it's not the case that "someone would run across it and want to know what it means". - -sche (discuss) 23:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedias make up all sorts of terms. — Ungoliant (Falai) 23:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed, Metaknowledge hasn't 'missed' it's appearance in Wikipedia, just its not relevant. Other Wikipedias use protologisms. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 01:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC)