Talk:sentema
Add topicThe following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense "without a subject". A valid construction, surely, but Google Books gives mostly the first sense. ReVo has only the first one. By the way, it might be interesting to categorize Esperanto words with multiple analyses, like aroganta.__Gamren (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger, Lingo Bingo Dingo: Anything? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- The ping didn't work—from what I understand, a new ping requires a whole new post, not just a new signature. Therefore, pinging User:Lingo Bingo Dingo again.
- I looked on Tekstaro but could only find the other sense. —Granger (talk · contribs) 00:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- I couldn't find this sense on Google either. Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 09:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- RFV failed. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)