Talk:sea mammal
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 8 years ago by BD2412 in topic RFD discussion: October 2016–January 2017
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
SOP just like #marine mammal. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. DonnanZ (talk) 09:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as undefendable under CFI. Renard Migrant (talk) 14:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, unless there are some clearly defined boundaries regarding what does and doesn't fall into this category of animals. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete DCDuring TALK 01:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep
Abstain: I would like to keep this but cannot find a good enough rationale. The current translations in marine mammal are word-for-word translated compounds so they do not contribute to my version of translation target rationale: Finnish merinisäkäs, German Meeressäuger, Norwegian sjøpattedyr; there is Hebrew which I cannot figure out quickly; I wonder about Japanese "海獣" which seems to be "marine animal" rather than "marine mammal" from its parts. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)- Switching to keep per #marine mammal: polar bear is the culprit. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. — Ungoliant (falai) 12:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as per marine mammal above. - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 12:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note to closer: marine mammal has been kept. DonnanZ (talk) 00:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Donnanz, why don't you review the RFD before you jump to keeping your own entry? 5 people (me, RM, AS, DCD, U2764) voted to delete it and 3 (you, DP, and SoC) voted to keep it. That's 62.5% in favour of deleting it. The fairest thing to do would be to add
{{look}}
if you want to get more input; a disinterested party might judge it to be "no consensus", but there certainly is no consensus to keep it. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Donnanz, why don't you review the RFD before you jump to keeping your own entry? 5 people (me, RM, AS, DCD, U2764) voted to delete it and 3 (you, DP, and SoC) voted to keep it. That's 62.5% in favour of deleting it. The fairest thing to do would be to add
- As this entry links to marine mammal which has been removed from this list, I think it is quite fair to leave a note. DonnanZ (talk) 09:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
No consensus to delete. bd2412 T 13:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)