Talk:red-green-brown alliance
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Demonicallt in topic RFD discussion: October 2023–January 2024
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
red-green alliance was deleted, so maybe this too P. Sovjunk (talk) 10:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per my arguments in the previous RFD ... from my point of view this is the exact same situation, so the same argument holds. I'd point out, though, that with the previous RFD there was an existing entry red-green to which users could go, whereas there is no red-green-brown entry, nor do I suspect there ever will be, as the term is unlikely to occur in any other context. My point being that even people who voted delete in the previous RFD might see a reason to consider this one in a different light. —Soap— 13:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Put another way, if we delete this, where would a person seeing the phrase red-green-brown alliance go to look this up? —Soap— 14:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Word0151 (talk) 06:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, at least for now, since we have no political definition for brown. Wikipedia says brown can represent Nazism or fascism, but red-green-brown alliance says it represents ultranationalism (which is more precise from what I can tell). — excarnateSojourner (talk · contrib) 00:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)