Talk:quaterseintsinquantaquàter

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Surjection in topic RFD discussion: May–August 2018
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: May–August 2018

[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Per WT:CFI: "Numbers, numerals, and ordinals over 100 that are not single words or are sequences of digits should not be included in the dictionary, unless the number, numeral, or ordinal in question has a separate idiomatic sense that meets the CFI." SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 22:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Other ones (currently): duśeintsinquantasèt, duśeintsinquantasē, duśeintsinquantòt, quaterseintquarantanōv, quaterseintquarantòt, quaterseintsinquantadū, quaterseintsinquantaquàter, quaterseintsinquantatrī, quaterseintsinquantùn, quaterseintsinquànta, quaterseintveintedū, quaterseintveintquàter, quaterseintveintùn, quaterseintvèint, quaterseintùndeś, seintquarantaquàter, terśeintdòdeś, terśeintestantadū, terśeintestànta, terśeintnovantadū, terśeintnovantanōv, terśeintnovantaquàter, terśeintnovantasèt, terśeintnovantasìnc, terśeintnovantasē, terśeintnovantatrī, terśeintnovantòt, terśeintnovantùn, terśeintnovànta, terśeintquatòrdeś, terśeintquìndeś, terśeinttrèdeś. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 23:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Italian has similar entries: quattrocentocinquantaquattro. They too need to be considered. 87.92.53.164 23:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Found a Finnish term that should also be deleted: seitsemässadas. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 10:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
It looks like all of these pass CFI which, as you quoted, allows for entries that are single words. -Stelio (talk) 11:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
The keyword is separate idiomatic sense that meets the CFI. (e: These have no idiomatic meanings, so they're basically sum-of-parts.) SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 12:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Just to clarify: the entries I linked aren't single words, they're multiple words all chained together. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 12:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have started a BP discussion on the wider topic of single-word terms for large numbers here: Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2018/May#Large numbers. -Stelio (talk) 15:29, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Despite me myself opening this, it's quite obvious the consensus is to keep. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 20:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply