Talk:perfect time
Add topicLatest comment: 10 months ago by P. Sovjunk in topic RFD discussion: February–April 2024
Music sense
[edit]Is it not the wrong way round? Justin the Just (talk) 17:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Justin the Just: Please elaborate (on my talk page where I will see it). Equinox ◑ 02:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
SOP bullshit Denazz (talk) 10:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yikes, strong delete. Compare "the perfect opportunity", etc. etc. Equinox ◑ 13:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fay Freak (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as SoP. — Sgconlaw (talk) 11:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, SOP. Entry's creator is adding a lot of crap I'm afraid. PUC – 20:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- The entry "perfect time" was originally red-linked by another user under the "derived terms" section of time: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/time#Hyponyms, so I felt there was a need to create it.
- There is no need for you to denigrate and insult me or my contributions. newfiles (talk) 04:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the amazing Kiwima added another sense to this entry, which would make this entry perfectly legitimate and it could then be safely removed from RFD. newfiles (talk) 18:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mynewfiles: that does not resolve the SoP status of sense 1. Also, just because one sees a red link somewhere does not necessarily mean that it is a proper entry to be created. Since this is a wiki, the link could have been added by an editor unfamiliar with policies such as "Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion". — Sgconlaw (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification. But I don't appreciate "PUC"'s comment that I'm "adding a lot of crap". That is very rude of him. I'm very conscientious of the entries that I create. newfiles (talk) 18:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mynewfiles: that does not resolve the SoP status of sense 1. Also, just because one sees a red link somewhere does not necessarily mean that it is a proper entry to be created. Since this is a wiki, the link could have been added by an editor unfamiliar with policies such as "Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion". — Sgconlaw (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete sense 1, reword sense 2 to something like "3/4 time, a time signature where three quarter notes make up a beat". CitationsFreak (talk) 06:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I would say that 'bar' would be a better choice of word than 'beat' here but I agree (of course I prefer 'crotchet' to 'quarter note' too). --Overlordnat1 (talk) 08:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I meant to write "bar". (Don't care it says "crotchet".) CitationsFreak (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I would say that 'bar' would be a better choice of word than 'beat' here but I agree (of course I prefer 'crotchet' to 'quarter note' too). --Overlordnat1 (talk) 08:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- RFD-failed P. Sovjunk (talk) 20:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)