Talk:pêras
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Polomo47 in topic RFD discussion: December 2024
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Portuguese. Had previously put this under {{d}}
, but I realize the error of my ways. I'll give more explanation. This was never a thing, because the distinctive accent doesn't appear in inflections that have nothing to distinguish from. <pêra> /e/ exists because of <pera> /ɛ/; meanwhile, there is no <peras> /ɛ/, so the form with /e/ gets no accent. See this topic addressed in Ciberdúvidas. Polomo47 (talk) 03:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Polomo47: Keep it as a misspelling of peras. The Web/Dialects Portuguese corpus contains 390 attestations to it. Davi6596 (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Somehow I never really entertained that idea, though it seems obvious. That's a better idea, yes. Will do. Polomo47 (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Davi. I could also see someone (mistakenly) thinking it exists due to "peras" /ɛ/, inflection of "perar" from "esperar". MedK1 (talk) 16:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- RFD-resolved (i.e., kept the page but altered the definition) Polomo47 (talk) 18:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)