Talk:njuugen
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Thadh in topic RFV discussion: January 2021–January 2022
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Same as with soogen: Quite probably a misspelling of the actual lemma, njúgen. This time there is a difference in pronunciation (/u/ vs /uː/), but it could still very well be a result of an oral source ([uˑ] vs [uː] respectively). Only hit on google books I could check was a mention at Wurdlist Fryske-Sealtersk ([1]), not sure if this can be called an authorative source. Thadh (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Pyt Kramer, Wurdlist Fryske-Sealtersk, Ljouwert, 1964 has njuugen (Saterland Frisian, Saterlandic) = njoggen and Saterfrisian is a WT:LDL.
- P. Kramer, Lound un Noomen: Die saterfriesischen Orts- und Flurnamen in der Landschaft. Einschließlich Länder- und Gewässernamen. 1. Beend: Text. With a summary in English, Mildaam, 1994 might be another source, and gets mentioned in Handbuch des Friesischen, Handbuch der Sprachminderheiten in Deutschland, Deutsches Ortsnamenbuch. oocities.org adds: "Schreibweise von 1960" (refering to the High German or to the East Frisian?).
- Possibly not durably archived: nwzonline.de: Seeltersk: Dät „ieuwen gau“ dooget oafter niks: "Dät waas njuugen Uur, as iek ap mien Klokke keek.". But the author is Grosser, and her works might contain the term as well. --46.91.98.89 14:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- I found it: The German Wikipedia explains this phenomenon that these vowels don't match up. It says that since every new researcher developed a new orthography for the language, and no official orthography has been developed, such cases as here (njuugen vs njúgen or soogen vs sogen) appeared. So this is a matter of deciding what orthography we want to follow on Wiktionary rather than whether these writing systems are correct. In light of this information, I believe this discussion should be moved to the Beer Parlour? @Leasnam, Chuck Entz, Apisite pinging other editors that have been part of this conversation some way or another Thadh (talk) 15:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- It rather sounds like the vowels do match up and both uu and ú denote a long /u:/ :) . Like with colour vs. color both should stay and be labelled. (People might come across either spelling and search for it here.) --46.91.98.89 01:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- But once again, in the orthography handled by SW, uu denotes the short /u/, while úu denotes the long /uː/, so they do not match. As for creating entries, we still need to decide which spelling to give a full entry (opposed to an alternative form) and if we want to include any mentioned form or just the ones quotable. Thadh (talk) 09:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- It rather sounds like the vowels do match up and both uu and ú denote a long /u:/ :) . Like with colour vs. color both should stay and be labelled. (People might come across either spelling and search for it here.) --46.91.98.89 01:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- I found it: The German Wikipedia explains this phenomenon that these vowels don't match up. It says that since every new researcher developed a new orthography for the language, and no official orthography has been developed, such cases as here (njuugen vs njúgen or soogen vs sogen) appeared. So this is a matter of deciding what orthography we want to follow on Wiktionary rather than whether these writing systems are correct. In light of this information, I believe this discussion should be moved to the Beer Parlour? @Leasnam, Chuck Entz, Apisite pinging other editors that have been part of this conversation some way or another Thadh (talk) 15:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Resolved, kept as an alternative spelling. Thadh (talk) 13:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)