Talk:lobɛ́ki

RFV discussion: October 2020–March 2021

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

lobɛ́ki

RFD'ed by @Lucumur with no reasoning. Presumably they believed it to be non-existent, hence why I'm RFV'ing it.__Gamren (talk) 12:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I have found one dictionary source for "lobɛ́ki" (as well as a separate lobéki) but I agree that mbɛ́ki is way more commonly declined as a class 9/10 noun (i.e. invariant singular - plural). That has much more attestation (e.g. Luke 8:16). Michael Ly (talk) 10:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

So, do we trust the dictionary and is it enough to verify this as a variant? User:Metaknowledge? - -sche (discuss) 02:36, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

• RFV-kept. I think that dictionary looks perfectly fine. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 06:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)