Talk:haltica
Add topicLatest comment: 6 years ago by Gamren in topic RFV discussion: May 2017–June 2018
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
- As for the noun: By the version history and the given ref (compare this revision of haltica and this revision of altica) it's very likely just Haltica and Altica put into wrong entries.
- As for the adjectives: There are haltica and altica without any gender and they don't have a nominative entry halticus or alticus, and so they don't have any definition. Very likely it's just the word used in Translingual taxonomic names like "Phalaena altica" and "Oeonistis altica" (these both names are rare) which instead of being an adjective could be the noun used in apposition (comparable to Vulpes vulpes).
-84.161.43.47 21:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 11:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)