Talk:exuperable
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: March–July 2015
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Looks like a dictionary-only word. DCDuring TALK 10:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- I can find lots of mentions, but only one use. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 13:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Although I didn't find any more exuperables, I found enough inexuperables to start a page. Smurrayinchester (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- I think many English dictionaries went to their Latin, French, or Italian dictionaries, found words that could plausibly be turned into English words, and dispensed with finding any actual usage. I'm doing the same thing with Latin words ending in "bilis", except I'm checking for actual usage, using
{{trans-see}}to send would-be translators (and others) to less rare synonyms where they exist, and extirpating the word from any definitions in favor of any less rare synonym. DCDuring TALK 17:19, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- I think many English dictionaries went to their Latin, French, or Italian dictionaries, found words that could plausibly be turned into English words, and dispensed with finding any actual usage. I'm doing the same thing with Latin words ending in "bilis", except I'm checking for actual usage, using
- Although I didn't find any more exuperables, I found enough inexuperables to start a page. Smurrayinchester (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 21:09, 16 July 2015 (UTC)