Talk:enhort
Add topicLatest comment: 7 months ago by Surjection in topic RFV discussion: December 2023–May 2024
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Likely didn't survive out of Middle English. The OED quotations year cutoff is 1484. EEBO only returns dictionary results. lattermint (talk) 23:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- I found a letter dated 1772 (published in 1795) - the citation is on the citations page. Other than that, all I found was this, which is far too modern, and which I therefore suspect is either a typo for exhort or an error by a non-native speaker. Kiwima (talk) 03:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- RFV failed, the ME entry is already created. lattermint (talk) 13:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Surjection @Lattermint Should enhorts, enhorting, enhorted be deleted too? Vuccala (talk) 08:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, they should. — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 08:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Surjection @Lattermint Should enhorts, enhorting, enhorted be deleted too? Vuccala (talk) 08:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)