Talk:eigenaard
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Morgengave
@Morgengave Do you think this could be a backformation from eigenaardig. Eigenaardig is well attested since the 18th century, but eigenaard becomes common in the late 19th century (maybe it's attested a little earlier). ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Lingo Bingo Dingo That makes sense for me seen the time gap between the attestations. On the other hand, if we don't have sources, we don't know for sure, so I suppose it warrants the "likely" or "possibly" qualifier. Morgengave (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Morgengave It just occurred to me that there might be a rival hypothesis if a German counterpart exists, after all eigenaardig is a calque from German, and lo Eigenart exists. Shall I take it to the ES?
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)- @Lingo Bingo Dingo Oh, yes, you are right! Yes, good idea! Morgengave (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Morgengave It just occurred to me that there might be a rival hypothesis if a German counterpart exists, after all eigenaardig is a calque from German, and lo Eigenart exists. Shall I take it to the ES?