Talk:donaldtrumpi

RFV discussion: July 2020

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

donaldtrumpi

Rfv-senses:

• Neopalpa donaldtrumpi
• Tetragramma donaldtrumpi
• Dermophis donaldtrumpi

The taxonomic names exist. The question is whether the specific epithet alone is used to refer to them. DCDuring (talk) 03:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

• Speedied. Clearly not citable, as it's hard to say whether something like Tetragramma donaldtrumpi is even citable as a whole, and use of a bare specific epithet to refer to a species in print is both nonstandard and highly unusual. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 03:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

  What's the rush? The contributor can struggle to cite them and maybe learn something. Hell, we might learn something. DCDuring (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

  I don't think that anon will even notice this discussion. If you ever try helping with clearing out this page, you'll understand why I prefer to speedy something I would have shot on sight had I seen the edit when it was first made. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 08:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

I don't have the expertise to do much on this page and don't have skin thick enough to try. I'd have been happy to have looked at this in 30 days. DCDuring (talk) 06:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)