Talk:disculus visionis digitalis

RFD discussion: April 2018

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

disculus visionis digitalis

Seems unlikely to exist, as we don't have an entry for disculus. SemperBlotto (talk) 10:46, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean? We don't have an entry yet, but it's trivially attestable. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 10:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

I've now added an entry for disculus. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 06:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

• Keep. There's a cite already on the page, and Latin is not a WDL. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 10:54, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
• Keep. There is a quotation from the Vatican. Because this is arguably the highest authority for modern Latin, I vote to immediately remove the RFD. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 02:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
• Decision: Keep. disculus is now an entry, and well-attested back to the 19th century. --Robert.Baruch (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
  • OK. So, can disculus mean diskette or floppy disk? SemperBlotto (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
    • Maybe neither? It just seems to mean a little disc. Diskette seems to mean a magnetic medium, which CDs and DVDs are not. I don't think disculus == diskette. ---Robert.Baruch (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)