Talk:demouse

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Smuconlaw in topic RFV discussion: March 2017
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: December 2016–March 2017

[edit]
See Talk:worriable#RFD discussion: December 2016–March 2017.

RFV discussion: March 2017

[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Two quotations are at Citations:demouse; can we find third to meet WT:ATTEST? --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cited, after a quick search using "Quiet Quentin" (possibly the most useful editing tool on Wiktionary! Kudos to whoever created it). Andrew Sheedy (talk) 09:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Verified. Also, I agree to your comment about Quiet Quentin to an extent. However, I'm not sure what algorithm QQ uses to retrieve sources. I have often found that a direct search at Google Books yields more results than what QQ produces. Google Books also allows you to select between results with previews and full views, and to filter the results by date (for example, it is possible to retrieve results from older works by selecting a date range such as 1 January 1200 to 31 December 1799). — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, QQ isn't ideal for in-depth searching, but for adding cites, it sure beats doing it manually (although it would be even better if it inserted stuff into templates). Andrew Sheedy (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Indeed. I wonder who is maintaining this tool? — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply