Talk:worriable
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: December 2016–March 2017
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Hi, This word may be rare but is not a protologism, it has been used quite widely on the Internet. Concerning "demouse", it's the same as "derat", which has an entry here. 193.54.167.180 15:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Please add CFI-compliant citations to Citations:worriable and Citations:demouse. Once there are three independent citations spanning more than a year, the entries can be undeleted. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- The first one can be undeleted, the second is difficult to find because of "demo use" parasiting the research. 193.54.167.180 17:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- worriable has been cited, demouse hasn't (yet). SemperBlotto (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- It is now, I had to remove the "http//" because some silly filter disallow it (then, how to insert a link ???). 193.54.167.180 17:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- RFD kept on worriable and demouse; both are RFV matter and RFD was only used to restore them. Furthermore, no consensus for deletion is found in this RFD. However, Citations:demouse contains only 2 citations unlike what WT:ATTEST requires so I am sending it to RFV. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)