Talk:behavioural pattern
Add topicDeletion discussion
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
"A design pattern that identifies common communication patterns between objects and increase flexibility in carrying out this communication." where "common communication patterns" is a long way of saying "behaviours" (and also the plural behavioural patterns. Furius (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. DAVilla 12:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 07:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
"A design pattern that eases the design by identifying a simple way to realize relationships between entities" i.e. a pattern which provides structure. Furius (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not any pattern, a design pattern. Keep. DAVilla 12:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Then that meaning ought to be stored at pattern (an extension of meaning one point one, perhaps). Because anything at all can have a design pattern behind it - w:Category:Software_design_patterns contains 83 different types of software pattern, so far. The meanings of all of them are deductable from their first component - and when one can't do so from that component's wiktionary entry, that reflects the need for a more technical definition at the entry for the first term. All of them have the same meaning in computer science regardless of whether they are a pattern or not. Furius (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep this, as it is a term of a special kind of design pattern. --Sae1962 (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Clearly not a term, but a two-word phrase. Note that structural patterns are also called structural design patterns. —RuakhTALK 04:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Also, deleted as copyvio, but that's neither here nor there, since of course this discussion could conclude that the entry can be recreated without the copyvio. —RuakhTALK 04:34, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
RFD
[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
"A design pattern that identifies common communication patterns between objects and increase flexibility in carrying out this communication." where "common communication patterns" is a long way of saying "behaviours" (and also the plural behavioural patterns. Furius (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. DAVilla 12:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 07:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Discussion restored. This was archived as having failed by a non-admin; clearly it has not, as the entry still exists, and a clear consensus on the merits of the term has not been reached. bd2412 T 16:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Argh, as with most Sae1962 entries, I have no idea what this means. If this gets kept, please define in a way that English speakers can understand it. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. It’s idiomatic, but I agree that it could have a better definition. I’ll try to work one out. — Ungoliant (Falai) 23:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 21:49, 28 February 2013 (UTC)