Talk:behavioural pattern

Deletion discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

"A design pattern that identifies common communication patterns between objects and increase flexibility in carrying out this communication." where "common communication patterns" is a long way of saying "behaviours" (and also the plural behavioural patterns. Furius (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep. DAVilla 12:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Delete —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 07:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

"A design pattern that eases the design by identifying a simple way to realize relationships between entities" i.e. a pattern which provides structure. Furius (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Not any pattern, a design pattern. Keep. DAVilla 12:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Then that meaning ought to be stored at pattern (an extension of meaning one point one, perhaps). Because anything at all can have a design pattern behind it - w:Category:Software_design_patterns contains 83 different types of software pattern, so far. The meanings of all of them are deductable from their first component - and when one can't do so from that component's wiktionary entry, that reflects the need for a more technical definition at the entry for the first term. All of them have the same meaning in computer science regardless of whether they are a pattern or not. Furius (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep this, as it is a term of a special kind of design pattern. --Sae1962 (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Delete. Clearly not a term, but a two-word phrase. Note that structural patterns are also called structural design patterns. —Ruakh_TALK 04:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Also, deleted as copyvio, but that's neither here nor there, since of course this discussion could conclude that the entry can be recreated without the copyvio. —Ruakh_TALK 04:34, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

RFD

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

"A design pattern that identifies common communication patterns between objects and increase flexibility in carrying out this communication." where "common communication patterns" is a long way of saying "behaviours" (and also the plural behavioural patterns. Furius (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep. DAVilla 12:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Delete —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 07:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Discussion restored. This was archived as having failed by a non-admin; clearly it has not, as the entry still exists, and a clear consensus on the merits of the term has not been reached. bd2412 T 16:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Argh, as with most Sae1962 entries, I have no idea what this means. If this gets kept, please define in a way that English speakers can understand it. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep. It’s idiomatic, but I agree that it could have a better definition. I’ll try to work one out. — Ungoliant ^(Falai) 23:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep. Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 21:49, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Kept. bd2412 T 19:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)