Talk:aspirador de pó

RFD discussion: August 2023–February 2025

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

aspirador de pó

Portuguese SOP. - Sarilho1 (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Delete. Imetsia (talk (more)) 15:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Delete — Fenakhay ^{(حيطي · مساهماتي)} 15:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Keep. It's not SOP if you analyze "aspirador" as a clipping of "aspirador de pó". It makes sense when you consider that the term works like any regular term formed with -dor and possesses a few other meanings according to any other dictionary, like Priberam or Infopédia. MedK1 (talk) 21:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

• Keep Passes the empty space test since "de pó" is redundant, and I suspect per MedK1's comment that it may pass the WT:JIFFY test as well, if aspirador was originally coined for exclusive use in the expression aspirador de pó. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Keep. Replied to this old discussion just to say this. Polomo47 (talk) 02:31, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Keep for the reasons above. Davi6596 (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

RFD-kept. Imetsia (talk (more)) 18:57, 1 February 2025 (UTC)